Deflationism and the normativity of truth
Philosophical Studies 112 (1):47 - 67 (2003)
| Abstract | This paper argues, in response to Huw Price, that deflationism has the resources to account for the normativity of truth. The discussion centers on a principle of hyper-objective assertibility, that one is incorrect to assert that p if not-p. If this principle doesn't state a fact about truth, it neednt be explained by deflationists. If it does,, it can be explained. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHuw Price (1997). What Should a Deflationist About Truth Say About Meaning? Philosophical Issues 8:107-115.
Glen Hoffmann (2007). A Dilemma for the Weak Deflationist About Truth. Sorites 18:129-137.
Lionel Shapiro (2011). Deflating Logical Consequence. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):320-342.
Leon Horsten (2009). Levity. Mind 118 (471):555-581.
Aladdin M. Yaqub (2008). Two Types of Deflationism. Synthese 165 (1):77 - 106.
Bruno Mölder (2008). Normativity and Deflationary Theories of Truth. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1:179-193.
Panu Raatikainen (2006). Problems of Deflationism. In Tuomo Aho Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.), Acta Philosophica Fennica.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads29 ( #42,452 of 549,370 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,370 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
