|Abstract||We pretend that philosophical problems divide into the various subfields of philosophy, but to take this pretense too seriously is a mistake. Philosophical problems often raise issues within more than one subfield, and require knowledge of and insights from several subfields. To pretend that ethical questions can be pursued in isolation from the rest of philosophy would be to miss out on a great deal. This course will highlight some recent, cutting—edge work on problems at the overlap of ethics and three other subfields of philosophy. The course has three sections: Ethics and Metaphysics, Ethics and Language, and Ethics and Epistemology. We will examine questions such as the following: ls there moral luck? ls there a morally significant making/allowing distinction? Can work in the metaphysics of causation help us to answer these two questions? Does a careful reflection on modality, and the recognition that each of us could have lived different lives, ultimately show that consequentialism is true? Can recent work in the philosophy of language on generics help us to understand moral generalizations better? Can it help us to settle whether particularism is true? Can recent work on semantic relativism solve problems for Expressivism? What can advances in the study of vagueness tell us about slippery—slope arguments and other Sorites—like arguments in ethics? Should we expect reasonable, fully—informed people to converge on the same moral beliefs over time? What is the epistemic significance of our predictions regarding convergence? What is the epistemic significance of widespread moral disagreement? ls it reasonable to rely on first—order moral beliefs in answering such meta—ethical questions as d0 we have maral knawledge? and is maral realism true} Are there moral experts?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2006). Moral Skepticisms. Oxford University Press.
Heather Dyke (2003). What Moral Realism Can Learn From the Philosophy of Time. In Heather Dyke (ed.), Time and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ralph Wedgwood (2010). The Moral Evil Demons. In Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
Emeric Solymossy & John K. Masters (2002). Ethics Through an Entrepreneurial Lens: Theory and Observation. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3):227 - 241.
Rush Rhees (1999). Moral Questions. St. Martin's Press.
Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos (1993). Development of a Cognitive Skill in Solving Business Ethics Problems: The Effect of Instruction. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (5):379 - 386.
Stephen L. Darwall (ed.) (1997). Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Guy Axtell & Philip Olson (2012). Recent Work in Applied Virtue Ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):183-204.
Manuel Vargas (2009). Taking the Highway on Skepticism, Luck, and the Value of Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):249-265.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2004). Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? Oxford University Press.
Sherwin Klein (1985). Two Views of Business Ethics: A Popular Philosophical Approach and a Value Based Interdisciplinary One. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):71 - 79.
Soran Reader (2000). New Directions in Ethics: Naturalisms, Reasons and Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):341-364.
Added to index2011-01-27
Total downloads74 ( #11,145 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?