Nanoethics 4 (1):1-12 (2010)
|Abstract||Little if any of the scholarly literature on nanotechnology (NT) and ethics is directed at NT researchers. Many of these practitioners believe that having clear ethical guidelines for the conduct of NT research is necessary. This work attempts to provide such guidelines. While no qualitatively new ethical issues unique to NT have yet been identified, the ethical responsibilities identified below merit serious attention by NT researchers. Thirteen specific ethical responsibilities arising at three levels are identified. They are derived by applying four fundamental ethical responsibilities of scientists and engineers to the specific conditions of NT research and researchers in contemporary Western societies. Since society is placing increasing importance on producing scientists and engineers who combine high technical competence with a sensitive ethical compass, study of the ethical dimension of NT, including the identified ethical responsibilities, should become a required element of the formal education of all NT researchers.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rosalyn W. Berne (2006). Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engineers About Ethics, Meaning, and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Guillermo Foladori, Noela Invernizzi & Edgar Záyago (2009). Two Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3 (2):121-127.
Ralph W. Giacobbe & Madhav N. Segal (2000). A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Perceptions in Marketing Research: U.S.A. Vs. Canada. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3).
David J. Pittenger (1994). The Cross-Disciplinary Ethical Responsibilities of Psychology Faculty. Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):199 – 208.
Robert E. McGinn (2010). What's Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers. Nanoethics 4 (2):115-128.
Michael Kalichman (2002). Ethical Decision-Making in Research: Identifying All Competing Interests. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2).
Sandra T. Sigmon (1995). Ethical Practices and Beliefs of Psychopathology Researchers. Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):295 – 309.
Roshan D. Ahuja, Mary Walker & Raghu Tadepalli (2001). Paternalism, Limited Paternalism and the Pontius Pilate Plight When Researching Children. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):81 - 92.
Brian Schrag, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil, Tristan J. Fiedler, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil & Tristan J. Fiedler (2003). Barking Up the Wrong Tree? Industry Funding of Academic Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):569-582.
Added to index2010-02-15
Total downloads42 ( #27,042 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?