David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper I show that two conflicting theories of literal meaning can be found in Donald Davidson's philosophy of language. In his earlier writings, Davidson espoused the common sense idea that words have literal meanings independently of particular contexts of use. In his later writings, however, Davidson insisted that the literal meaning of a word is a function of the speaker's intentions in using it, from which it follows that words do not have literal meanings independently of particular contexts. In this paper I examine and evaluate the transition from Davidson's earlier to his later view of literal meaning. I show that the change in view came about through Davidson's efforts to extend a theory of literal meaning to malapropisms but that Davidson's understanding of malapropisms is seriously flawed. I conclude that Davidson had no good reason for espousing his later intentions-based theory of literal meaning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. J. L. Talmage (1994). Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning. Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Marga Reimer (2004). What Malapropisms Mean: A Reply to Donald Davidson. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 60 (3):317-334.
Aaron Wilson (2011). Peirce Versus Davidson on Metaphorical Meaning. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):117-135.
Ehud Rahat (1992). Metaphors and Malapropisms: Davidson on the Limits of the Literal. Philosophia 21 (3-4):311-327.
Andrei Marmor (2008). Is Literal Meaning Conventional? Topoi 27 (1-2):101-113.
Martin Gustafsson (2011). Familiar Words in Unfamiliar Surroundings: Davidson's Malapropisms, Cavell's Projections. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):643 - 668.
Nat Hansen (2012). J. L. Austin and Literal Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):n/a-n/a.
Anthony Dardis (1994). How the Radically Interpreted Make Mistakes. Dialogue 33 (03):415-.
Eva Picardi (2006). Colouring, Multiple Propositions, and Assertoric Content. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):49-71.
Ralf Stoecker (ed.) (1993). Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson Responding to an International Forum of Philosophers. W. De Gruyter.
Alexander J. Doherty (2002). Aquinas on Scriptural Metaphor and Allegory. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:183-192.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads8 ( #136,109 of 1,004,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?