David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 16 (4):425-436 (1994)
From the “deep” ecological perspective, there is a dualism between an ecocentric and an anthropocentric perspective, and this dualism is reflected in the ideal of the bureaucratic experience. The bureaucrat lives by the myth of the human ability to control nature. An eco-myth is evolving that can offer one means of transcending the dominant bureaucratic mythic experience. This eco-myth movestoward a positive and sensitive human relationship with nature—a collective experience that values nature on its own terms and not as standing reserve. This position is no less mythic than the one it is replacing, but it is a better myth, because, being non-dualist, it offers the prospect of a political society in harmony with nature
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Allen Buchanan (1996). Toward a Theory of the Ethics of Bureaucratic Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):419-440.
Aviva Geva (2001). Myth and Ethics in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4):575-597.
Daniel Bonevac (2002). Sellars Vs. The Given. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):1-30.
Refeng Tang (2010). Conceptualism and the New Myth of the Given. Synthese 175 (1):101 - 122.
Kenneth Dorter (2003). Free Will, Luck, and Happiness in the Myth of Er. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:129-142.
Susan L. Hurley (1996). Myth Upon Myth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:253-260.
Tito Vignoli (1882/1978). Myth and Science. Arno Press.
S. J. Heyworth (1985). The Elegists' Use of Myth Richard Whitaker: Myth and Personal Experience in Roman–Love-Elegy. A Study in Poetic Technique. (Hypomnemata, 76.) Pp. 174. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983. Paper, DM. 36. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):31-32.
Robert A. Segal (2011). What is “Mythic Reality”? Zygon 46 (3):588-592.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #272,385 of 1,140,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?