Phronesis 51 (2):140-161 (2006)
|Abstract||Aristotle's account of place in terms of an innermost limit of a containing body was to generate serious discussion and controvery among Aristotle's later commentators, especially when it was applied to the cosmos as a whole. The problem was that since there is nothing outside of the cosmos that could contain it, the cosmos apparently could not have a place according to Aristotle's definition; however, if the cosmos does not have a place, then it is not clear that it could move, but it was thought to move, namely, in its daily revolution, which was viewed as a kind of natural locomotion and so required the cosmos to have a place. The study briefly outlines Aristotle's account of place and then considers its fate, particularly with respect to the cosmos and its motion, at the hands of later commentators. To this end, it begins with Theophrastus' puzzles concerning Aristotle's account of place, and how later Greek commentators, such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius and others, attempted to address these problems in what can only be described as ad hoc ways. It then considers Philoponus' exploitation of these problems as a means to replace Aristotle's account of place with his own account of place understood in terms of extension. The study concludes with the Arabic Neoplatonizing Aristotelian Avicenna and his novel introduction of a new category of motion, namely, motion in the category of position. Briefly, Avicenna denies that the cosmos has a place, and so claims that it moves not with respect to place, but with respect to position|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jon McGinnis (2006). Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian. Phronesis 51 (2):140 - 161.
Francis Rumsey (2008). Faithful to His Master's Voice? : Questions of Fidelity and Infidelity in Music Recording. In Mine Doğantan (ed.), Recorded Music: Philosophical and Critical Reflections. Middlesex University Press.
Douglas Erlandson & Charles Sayward (1981). Is Heaven a Possible World? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (1):55 - 58.
David Papineau, Metaphysics Over Methodology--Or, Why Infidelity Provides No Grounds To Divorce Causes From Probabilities.
Yujin Nagasawa (2004). Salvation in Heaven? Philosophical Papers 33 (1):97-119.
James F. Sennett (1999). Is There Freedom In Heaven? Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):69-82.
Yun Chen (2009). Revealing the Dao of Heaven Through the Dao of Humans: Sincerity in the Doctrine of the Mean. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):537-551.
Teske (2000). The Heaven of Heaven and the Unity of St. Augustine's Confessions. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1):29-45.
S. J. Roland J. Teske (2000). The Heaven of Heaven and the Unity of St. Augustine's Confessions. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1).
Kevin Timpe & Timothy Pawl (2009). Incompatibilism, Sin, and Free Will in Heaven. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):398-419.
Timothy Pawl & Kevin Timpe (2009). Incompatibilism, Sin, and Free Will in Heaven. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):398-419.
Arend Theodoor van Leeuwen (1972). Critique of Heaven: The First Series of the Gifford Lectures Entitled "Critique of Heaven and Earth". Scribner.
Tatiana Fumasoli & Jeroen Huisman (2013). Strategic Agency and System Diversity: Conceptualizing Institutional Positioning in Higher Education. Minerva 51 (2):155-169.
Patrick Baert (2012). Positioning Theory and Intellectual Interventions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3):304-324.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads9 ( #122,367 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?