Researching and teaching the ethics and social implications of emerging technologies in the laboratory
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
NanoEthics 3 (1):17-30 (2009)
Ethicists and others who study and teach the social implications of science and technology are faced with a formidable challenge when they seek to address “emerging technologies.” The topic is incredibly important, but difficult to grasp because not only are the precise issues often unclear, what the technology will ultimately look like can be difficult to discern. This paper argues that one particularly useful way to overcome these difficulties is to engage with their natural science and engineering colleagues in laboratories. Through discussions and interactions with these colleagues ethicists can simultaneously achieve three important objectives. First they can get a great deal of assistance in their research into the social implications of future technologies by talking with people that are actively creating those futures. Second their presence in the lab and the discussions that result can be a very powerful method for educating not only students, but faculty about the ramifications of their work. And third, because the education is directly linked to the students’ everyday work it is likely that it will not just be a theoretical exercise, but have direct impact on their practice.
|Keywords||Emerging technologies Ethics Laboratories|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rosalyn W. Berne (2006). Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engineers About Ethics, Meaning, and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ruth R. Faden, Michael J. Klag, Nancy E. Kass & Sharon S. Krag (2002). On the Importance of Research Ethics and Mentoring. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):50 – 51.
Erik Fisher (2007). Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (2):155-165.
Michael Kalichman & Sarah Brown (1998). Effects of Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Survey of Graduate Students in Experimental Sciences. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):487-498.
Bruno Latour & Steven Woolgar (1986). Laboratory Life; The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Rider W. Foley, Ira Bennett & Jameson M. Wetmore (2012). Practitioners' Views on Responsibility: Applying Nanoethics. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 6 (3):231-241.
Daan Schuurbiers, Susanne Sleenhoff, Johannes Jacobs & Patricia Osseweijer (2009). Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education—The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model. NanoEthics 3 (3):197-211.
Ana Viseu & Heather Maguire (2012). Integrating and Enacting 'Social and Ethical Issues' in Nanotechnology Practices. NanoEthics 6 (3):195-209.
Erik Fisher & Michael Lightner (2009). Entering the Social Experiment: A Case for the Informed Consent of Graduate Engineering Students. Social Epistemology 23 (3):283-300.
Stephen H. Cutcliffe, Christine M. Pense & Michael Zvalaren (2012). Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying. NanoEthics 6 (2):81-99.
Similar books and articles
Sonja Olin-Lauritzen & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.) (2007). Medical Technologies and the Life World: The Social Construction of Normality. Routledge.
Sarah Spiekermann & Frank Pallas (2006). Technology Paternalism – Wider Implications of Ubiquitous Computing. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):6-18.
Shannon Vallor (2010). Social Networking Technology and the Virtues. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):157-170.
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics 1 (4):20-38.
Mary J. Granger & Joyce Currie Little (2001). Creating an Organizational Awareness of Ethical Responsibility About Information Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):239-246.
Philip Brey (2012). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 6 (1):1-13.
Federica Lucivero, Tsjalling Swierstra & Marianne Boenink (2011). Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 5 (2):129-141.
Trond Grønli Åm (2011). Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 5 (1):15-28.
Added to index2009-03-07
Total downloads9 ( #159,606 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,775 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?