David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 24 (4):415-437 (1988)
The Issues at Issue: Heidegger declares metaphor to be a function of metaphysics. Ricoeur's tension theory of metaphor takes the understanding of metaphor beyond metaphysics. Ricoeur's theory of metaphor is a theory of metaphorical statement not of naming. The classical, lexical theory of metaphor focuses on a primary meaning of each metaphor. As such metaphor is merely ornamentation in language. What it names could more appropriately be accomplished in literal language. In contrast, metaphor is understood by Ricoeur to be a semantic event made possible by three kinds of tensions. One may understand symbols to function with the same metaphorical tensions. In the case of symbols, however, these tensions function not at the level of the sentence but rather of the narrative. Metaphor and symbol both have an ‘ontological priority’ over other elements of discourse and experience. They ‘ work ’ because of the event character of both understanding and experience. Understanding and experience have event as their condition of possibility. Metaphor and symbol both have a ‘temporal priority’, as well, for they serve as the shock to think ‘more’. This can occur, however, because they are part of a circularity that is non-metaphysical, that is, the circularity of the event character of the Being-of beings. Hence, just as metaphors are always ‘larger’ than the sentence, so are symbols always ‘larger’ than the narrative.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arto Laitinen (2002). Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity. In Rauno Huttunen, Hannu Heikkinen & Leena Syrjälä (eds.), Narrative Research. Voices of Teachers and Philosophers. SoPhi 57-71.
S. H. Clark (1990). Paul Ricoeur. Routledge.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1990). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Clive Cazeaux (2011). Living Metaphor. Studi Filosofici 34 (1):291-308.
Kuruvilla Pandikattu (1999). Idols to Die, Symbols to Live (Paul Ricoeur). Interculturual Pub.
Shari Stone-Mediatore (2003). Reading Across Borders: Storytelling and Knowledges of Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michel Dion (2012). The Moral Discourse of Banks About Money Laundering: An Analysis of the Narrative From Paul Ricoeur's Philosophical Perspective. Business Ethics 21 (3):251-262.
Bipin Indurkhya (1999). Creativity of Metaphor in Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):621-622.
Maria Duffy (2012). Paul Ricoeur's Pedagogy of Pardon: A Narrative Theory of Memory and Forgetting. Continuum.
Robert Piercey (2008). How Paul Ricoeur Changed the World. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):463-479.
T. Peter Kemp & David M. Rasmussen (eds.) (1988). The Narrative Path: The Later Works of Paul Ricoeur. MIT Press.
Joan McCarthy (2007). Dennett and Ricoeur on the Narrative Self. Humanity Books.
Christina M. Gschwandtner (2001). Ricoeur's Hermeneutic of God. Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):287-309.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #510,333 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?