Rea on universalism
Analysis 61 (1):69–76 (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatthew McGrath (1998). Van Inwagen's Critique of Universalism. Analysis 58 (2):116–121.
Stewart Goetz (2010). Naturally Understanding Naturalism. Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):79-90.
Michael C. Rea (2002). World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Talbott (2001). Universalism and the Supposed Oddity of Our Earthly Life. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):102-109.
Jorn Sonderholm (2008). Having Fun with the Periodic Table: A Counterexample to Rea's Definition of Pornography. Philosophia 36 (2):233-236.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2003). In Defense of Naïve Universalism. Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):345-363.
Michael C. Rea (2010). Universalism and Extensionalism: A Reply to Varzi. Analysis 70 (3):490-496.
Michael C. Rea (1998). In Defense of Mereological Universalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):347-360.
Michael C. Rea (1999). McGrath on Universalism. Analysis 59 (263):200–203.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
