Realism, Reference and Grue (Why Metaphysical Realism Cannot Solve the Grue Paradox)

American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):47 - 57 (2003)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/20010096
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mary Kate McGowan (2002). Gruesome Connections. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):21-33.
C. A. Hooker (1968). Goodman, 'Grue' and Hempel. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):232-247.
J. S. Ullian (1961). More on "Grue" and Grue. Philosophical Review 70 (3):386-389.
Gary Sollazzo (1972). Barker and Achinstein on Goodman. Philosophical Studies 23 (1-2):91 - 97.
John Moreland (1976). On Projecting Grue. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
John R. Welch (2005). Gruesome Predicates. In Roberto Festa, Atocha Aliseda & Jeanne Peijnenburg (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Rodopi 129-137.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #132,874 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.