The Argument from Miracles: A Cumulative Case for the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth
In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Earman (2000). Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford University Press.
Brian Leftow (2011). Composition and Christology. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.
Eric Steinhart (2008). The Revision Theory of Resurrection. Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
David Mckenzie (1999). Miracles Are Not Immoral: A Response to James Keller's Moral Argument Against Miracles. Religious Studies 35 (1):73-88.
Stephen T. Davis (1999). Is Belief in the Resurrection Rational? Philo 2 (1):51-61.
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Michael Martin (1998). Why the Resurrection is Initially Improbable. Philo 1 (1):63-73.
James A. Keller (1988). Comtemporary Christian Doubts About the Resurrection. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):40-60.
N. N. (2005). Review of The Resurrection of God Incarnate. [REVIEW] Faith and Philosophy 22 (2):235 - 238.
Patrick Madigan (2009). The Healer From Nazareth: Jesus' Miracles in Historical Context. By Eric Eve. Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1027-1027.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-10Total downloads178 ( #1,716 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,205 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
