Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Geography 7 (1):79-93 (2004)
|Abstract||This essay examines neoconservative criticisms of equity planning, and the challenges against the right of government to regulate local development and land use. The specific concern of this essay is how, or if, local development administrators (equity planners), should use their discretionary powers to ensure that city officials and private developers promote and protect the interests of urban residents, particularly the poor and disadvantaged. The essay begins by discussing the alleged conflict said to exist between needy urban residents and the more secure urban taxpayers. The contrary views of equity planners are then reviewed, and the tensions within the neoconservative arguments are exposed and critiqued. Finally, the dispute between equity planners and neoconservatives is further explored by examining the dispute over the voucher system to address the problem of equal educational opportunity in urban communities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anne West (2006). School Choice, Equity and Social Justice: The Case for More Control. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1):15 - 33.
Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan (2007). Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private Equity. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):395 - 416.
Lawrence B. Solum (2007). A Virtue-Centered Account of Equity and the Rule of Law. In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence. Palgrave Macmillan.
Megan Black & Gavin Mooney (2002). Equity in Health Care From a Communitarian Standpoint. Health Care Analysis 10 (2):193-208.
Kevin Morrell & Ian Clark (2010). Private Equity and the Public Good. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):249 - 263.
Marcelo Lopes De Souza (2000). Urban Development on the Basis of Autonomy: A Politico-Philosophical and Ethical Framework for Urban Planning and Management. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):187 – 201.
Stephen R. Goldstein (ed.) (1992). Equity and Contemporary Legal Developments: Papers Presented at the First International Conference on Equity, the Faculty of Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, June 1990. Harry and Michael Sacher Institute for Legislative Research and Comparative Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
L. E. Falkenberg & L. Boland (1997). Eliminating the Barriers to Employment Equity in the Canadian Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):963-975.
Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (ed.) (1997). Aequitas and Equity: Equity in Civil Law and Mixed Jurisdictions. Harry and Michael Sacher Institute for Legislative Research and Comparative Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads20 ( #68,365 of 738,608 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?