Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):321-344 (2009)
|Abstract||Case B. You tell me that eating meat is immoral. Although I believe that, left to my own devices, I would not think this, no matter how long I reflected, I adopt your attitude as my own. It is not that I believe that you are better informed about potentially relevant non-moral facts (e.g., about the conditions under which livestock is kept, or about the typical effects of eliminating meat from one’s diet). On the contrary, I know that I have all of the non-moral information relevant to the issue that you have.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Laurence Thomas (1993). Moral Flourishing in an Unjust World. Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):83-96.
J. Wesley Robbins (1980). Narrative, Morality and Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):161 - 176.
Peter Baumann (2011). A Puzzle About Responsibility. Erkenntnis 74 (2):207-224.
Christian Arnsperger, Probing the “Moralization of Capitalism” Problem: Democratic Experimentalism and the Co-Evolution of Norms.
Anthony Preus (1984). Respect for the Dead and Dying. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):409-416.
Sarah McGrath (2007). Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Vol. 4. Oxford University Press.
Sarah McGrath (2011). Skepticism About Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism. Journal of Philosophy 108 (3):111-137.
David Detmer (2007). Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
Added to index2009-10-17
Total downloads50 ( #25,161 of 738,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,702 of 738,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?