The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Cath Univ Amer Pr (2011)
The paper treats Avicenna’s ’metaphysical’ argument for the existence of God and the modal metaphysics that underpins it. Earlier analyses of modalities attempted to reduce necessity, possibility and impossibility to nonmodal elements, which was done most commonly by appealing to a temporal frequency model of modalities. In contrast, Avicenna believed that modalities were an inherent feature of existence, and so just as there is nothing more basic than existence, so likewise there is nothing more basic in term of which modalities can be explained. The article concludes by considering how Avicenna’s modal metaphysics in turn provides him the means to show the absolute and nonconditional necessity of God, as opposed to the conditional necessity of earlier ’physical’ arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roland J. Teske (2007). Some Aspects of Henry of Ghent's Debt to Avicenna's Metaphysics. Modern Schoolman 85 (1):51 - 70.
R. E. Houser (2011). Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):355 - 375.
John F. Wippel (1999). Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Their Use of Avicenna in Clarifying the Subject of Metaphysics. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:15-26.
Forouzan Rasekhi & Somayeh Kolahduzan (2010). Cosmological Arguments: A Comparative Study of the Ideas of Allameh Tabataba'i and Avicenna (in Farsi). Hekmat Va Falsafeh 6 (23):107 - 129.
Henrik Lagerlund (2009). Avicenna and Ūsī on Modal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (3):227-239.
Tony Street (2000). Avicenna and Tusi on the Contradiction and Conversion of the Absolute. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (1):45-56.
Avicenna (2004). The Metaphysics of the Healing: A Parallel English-Arabic Text = Al-Ilahīyāt Min Al-Shifāʼ. Brigham Young University Press.
Peter Adamson (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Jari Kaukua (2011). The Physics of the Healing , Books I-Iv (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):245-246.
Amy Karofsky (2003). God, Modalities, and Conceptualism. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):257-271.
Peter Furlong (2009). The Latin Avicenna and Aquinas on the Relationship Between God and the Subject of Metaphysics. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:129-140.
Brian Leftow (2012). God and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
Raja Bahlul (2009). Avicenna and the Problem of Universals. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):3-25.
Rahim Acar (2005). Talking About God and Talking About Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas' Positions. Brill.
Gad Freudenthal & Mauro Zonta (2012). Avicenna Among Medieval Jews the Reception of Avicenna's Philosophical, Scientific and Medical Writings in Jewish Cultures, East and West. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22 (2):217-287.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-17
Total downloads1 ( #748,834 of 1,790,307 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,307 )
How can I increase my downloads?