Organon F 19 (suppl. 1):116-136 (2012)
|Abstract||In this paper I discuss the idea of a semantic code in the contemporary debate between contextualism and minimalism. First, I identify historical sources of these positions in Grice’s pragmatics and in Davidson’s theory of meaning in order to sketch the role of a semantic code there. Then I argue that contextualism is committed to the idea of an ad hoc code, while minimalism involves a persistent code. However, the latter approach to a code requires disambiguation which must be carried out in the early stages of speech act processing. I raise a concern that primary pragmatic processes may be active here, especially in the case of disambiguating polysemous expressions, which could be problematic or even devastating for the minimalist program. At the end I evaluate a possible minimalist way out by examining the minimalist account of metaphor, which lies at the root of polysemy. If a code robust enough to deal with polysemy could be created, minimalist conceptions would present a new impetus to understand language as a code. Without such a code, very little would be left of the notion of a persistent code and hence of minimalism itself.|
|Keywords||code contextualism minimalism metaphor|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kent Bach (2006). The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism Without Minimal Propositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):435–442.
Eros Corazza (2007). Contextualism, Minimalism, and Situationalism. Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (1):115-137.
John MacFarlane (2007). Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Michael T. Putnam & M. Carmen Parafita Couto (2009). When Grammars Collide: Code-Switching in Survive-Minimalism. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Towards a Derivational Syntax: Survive-Minimalism. John Benjamins Pub. Company.
Eros Corazza & Jérôme Dokic (2012). Situated Minimalism Versus Free Enrichment. Synthese 184 (2):179-198.
Ulrich E. Stegmann (2004). The Arbitrariness of the Genetic Code. Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):205-222.
Daniel Walter Skubik & Bruce W. Stening (2009). What's in a Credo? A Critique of the Academy of Management's Code of Ethical Conduct and Code of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):515 - 525.
Martin Montminy (2007). Epistemic Contextualism and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese 155 (1):99 - 125.
Yi-Hui Huang (2001). Should a Public Relations Code of Ethics Be Enforced? Journal of Business Ethics 31 (3):259 - 270.
Curtis Clements, John D. Neill & O. Scott Stovall (2009). An Analysis of International Accounting Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 87:173 - 183.
Cristi K. Lindblom & Robert G. Ruland (1997). Functionalist and Conflict Views of AICPA Code of Conduct: Public Interest Vs. Self Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):573-582.
Frode Kjosavik (2007). From Symbolism to Information? – Decoding the Gene Code. Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):333-349.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2005). A Tall Tale : In Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-10-01
Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?