H. E. McHaffie, M. Cuttini, G. Brolz-Voit, L. Randag, R. Mousty, A. M. Duguet, B. Wennergren & P. Benciolini
Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):440-446 (1999)
|Abstract||Representatives from eight European countries compared the legal, ethical and professional settings within which decision making for neonates takes place. When it comes to limiting treatment there is general agreement across all countries that overly aggressive treatment is to be discouraged. Nevertheless, strong emphasis has been placed on the need for compassionate care even where cure is not possible. Where a child will die irrespective of medical intervention, there is widespread acceptance of the practice of limiting aggressive treatment or alleviating suffering even if death may be hastened as a result. Where the infant could be saved but the future outlook is bleak there is more debate, but only two countries have tested the courts with such cases. When it comes to the active intentional ending of life, the legal position is standard across Europe; it is prohibited. However, recognising those intractable situations where death may be lingering and unpleasant, Dutch paediatricians have reported that they do sometimes assist babies to die with parental consent. Two cases have been tried through the courts and recent official recommendations have set out standards by which such actions may be assessed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dorothy Rasinski Gregory (1995). Network News: VA Network Futility Guidelines: A Resource for Decisions About Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (04):546-.
Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu (forthcoming). A Costly Separation Between Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Intensive Care. Bioethics.
Stanley A. Terman (2013). Is the Principle of Proportionality Sufficient to Guide Physicians' Decisions Regarding Withholding/Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment After Suicide Attempts? American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):22 - 24.
R. Gillon (1994). Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment--Moral Implications of a Thought Experiment. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):203-222.
G. Baeke, J. -P. Wils & B. Broeckaert (2011). Orthodox Jewish Perspectives on Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment. Nursing Ethics 18 (6):835-846.
Anne J. Davis (1991). Nurses and Physicians on Nutritional Support: A Comparison. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):259-283.
J. Brierley, J. Linthicum & A. Petros (2013). Should Religious Beliefs Be Allowed to Stonewall a Secular Approach to Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Children? Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):573-577.
Leonard H. Glantz (1987). Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment: The Role of the Criminal Law. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (4):231-241.
Dove Izraeli & Mark S. Schwartz (1998). What Can We Learn From the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1045-1055.
Wim Vandekerckhove & David Lewis (2012). The Content of Whistleblowing Procedures: A Critical Review of Recent Official Guidelines. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 108 (2):253-264.
D. P. Sulmasy & J. Sugarman (1994). Are Withholding and Withdrawing Therapy Always Morally Equivalent? Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):218-224.
J. Harris (1994). Are Withholding and Withdrawing Therapy Always Morally Equivalent? A Reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):223-224.
J. C. Sheather (2013). Withdrawing and Withholding Artificial Nutrition and Hydration From Patients in a Minimally Conscious State: Re: M and its Repercussions. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):543-546.
Hazel Biggs (2001). Euthanasia, Death with Dignity, and the Law. Hart Publishing.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads1 ( #290,877 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?