Emergence and reduction in chemistry: Ontological or epistemological concepts?

Synthese 155 (3):337-343 (2007)
In this paper I argue that the ontological interpretation of the concepts of reduction and emergence is often misleading in the philosophy of science and should nearly always be eschewed in favor of an epistemological interpretation. As a paradigm case, an example is drawn from the philosophy of chemistry to illustrate the drawbacks of “ontological reduction” and “ontological emergence,” and the virtues of an epistemological interpretation of these concepts.
Keywords Philosophy of Chemistry  Emergence  Reduction  Ontology  Epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/27653499
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sahotra Sarkar (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Alexandru Manafu (2014). How Much Philosophy in the Philosophy of Chemistry? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):33-44.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

185 ( #7,458 of 1,724,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #93,245 of 1,724,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.