Philosophical Studies 129 (2):253 - 261 (2006)
|Abstract||In everyday life people frequently recognize that a person at a time may be more or less strongly motivated to carry out an intentional action and that “trying harder” frequently affects the successful completion of an intentional action. In “Rational Choice and Action Omnipotence,” John Pollock provides an original account of rational choice in which “trying to do an action” is a basic factor. This paper argues that Pollock’s “expected-utility optimality prescription” is deficient because it lacks a parameter for intensity of trying. The paper also indicates specific ways in which this deficiency could be corrected.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward F. McClennen (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge University Press.
Milan Zafirovski (2000). The Rational Choice Generalization of Neoclassical Economics Reconsidered: Any Theoretical Legitimation for Economic Imperialism? Sociological Theory 18 (3):448-471.
Michael Neblo (2003). Joseph Heath, Communicative Action and Rational Choice:Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Ethics 114 (1):176-179.
Richard Holton (2006). The Act of Choice. Philosophers' Imprint 6 (3):1-15.
Mark Leon (2011). Reason and Coercion: In Defence of a Rational Control Account of Freedom. Philosophia 39 (4):733-740.
Ross Poole (1992). Living with Reason. Inquiry 35 (2):199 – 217.
John Ferejohn (2002). Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 1: Rational Choice Theory and Social Explanation. Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):211-234.
John L. Pollock (2002). Rational Choice and Action Omnipotence. Philosophical Review 111 (1):1-23.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #72,089 of 556,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?