Comment on a paper by professor Kemble
Philosophy of Science 20 (3):227-231 (1953)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. P. McKinney (1957). The Rational and the Real: Comment on a Paper by E. Topitsch. Philosophy of Science 24 (3):275-280.
Edwin C. Kemble (1941). The Probability Concept. Philosophy of Science 8 (2):204-232.
Gail Kennedy (1961). Comment on Professor Bernstein's Paper, "John Dewey's Metaphysics of Experience". Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):14-21.
Thomas Szasz (2010). Psychiatry, Anti-Psychiatry, Critical Psychiatry: What Do These Terms Mean? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (3).
Patrick Romanell & Israel H. Muraskin (1947). Comment on Professor Mcgill's Paper. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 7 (3):365-366.
Stewart Sutherland (1981). Comment on Professor Kuitert's Paper. Religious Studies 17 (2):245 - 251.
Colin Wright (1981). Comment on Professor Jeffner's Paper. Religious Studies 17 (2):227 - 232.
Edward Kent (1974). Comment on Professor Bowie's Paper. Idealistic Studies 4 (2):156-159.
R. L. Hudson (1981). Invited Comment on Professor Bub's Paper. Erkenntnis 16 (2):295 - 297.
E. C. Kemble (1953). Reply to Mr. McKinney. Philosophy of Science 20 (3):232-235.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
