How deep is your love?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):233-234 (1999)
| Abstract | The thesis that women will be more intent on staying alive fails to take into account that current strategies are those of the winners in the evolutionary race. Moreover, because like tends to mate with like, risk taking will be averaged out between the sexes. Finally, Campbell's narrow view of parental investment fails to acknowledge the indirect contributions of males. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFlorian Cova & Hichem Naar (2012). Testing Sripada's Deep Self Model. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):647 - 659.
Eric Schwitzgebel (2008). Thoughts on Conjugal Love. In Fidelo Leonore.
Sharon Krishek (2008). Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
S. Matthew Liao (2011). Parental Love Pills: Some Ethical Considerations. Bioethics 25 (9):489-494.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
