Inquiry 27 (1-4):225 – 233 (1984)
|Abstract||In The Point of View for my Work as an Author, Kierkegaard declares that the works discussed therein move from the aesthetic to the religious, that the Postscript represents the turning point in this movement, etc. In this brief and preliminary study we use a ?change?point? version of the chi?square test on the frequencies of selected sets of ?aesthetic? and ?religious? words to determine the degree of statistical evidence for these and other related claims. Briefly, these tests show that there is strong statistical evidence for all but one of these various claims and that there are therefore good statistical grounds for taking Kierkegaard's ?aesthetic/religious? interpretation seriously|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jan E. Evans & C. Stephen Evans (2004). Kierkegaard's Aesthete and Unamuno's. Philosophy and Literature 28 (2).
Søren Kierkegaard (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Strevens (2009). Objective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
Christopher A. P. Nelson (2006). Kierkegaard, Mysticism, and Jest: The Story of Little Ludvig. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (4):435-464.
Kent W. Staley, Strategies for Securing Evidence Through Model Criticism: An Error-Statistical Perspective.
Søren Kierkegaard (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Princeton University Press.
Amit Pundik, What is Wrong with Statistical Evidence? The Attempts to Establish an Epistemic Deficiency.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?