David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):349–369 (2003)
Many philosophers hold that all dispositions must have independent causal bases. I challenge this view, hence defending the possibility of bare dispositions. In part 1, I explain more fully what I mean by "disposition," "causal basis," and "bare disposition." In part 2, I consider the claim that the concept of a disposition entails that dispositions are not bare. In part 3, I consider arguments, due to Prior, Pargetter, and Jackson, that dispositions necessarily have distinct causal bases. In part 4, I consider arguments by Smith and Stoljar that there can't be bare dispositions because they would make for unwelcome "barely true" counterfactuals. In the end, I find no reason to deny the possibility of bare dispositions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Darren Bradley (2013). Functionalism and The Independence Problems. Noûs 47 (1):545-557.
Stephen Mumford (2006). The Ungrounded Argument. Synthese 149 (3):471 - 489.
Andrea Guardo (2012). Rule-Following, Ideal Conditions and Finkish Dispositions. Philosophical Studies 157 (2):195-209.
Toby Handfield (2008). Unfinkable Dispositions. Synthese 160 (2):297 - 308.
Matthew Tugby (2016). Universals, Laws, and Governance. Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1147-1163.
Similar books and articles
P. D. Magnus (2004). The Price of Insisting That Quantum Mechanics is Complete. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):257-267.
J. P. Moreland & Timothy Pickavance (2003). Bare Particulars and Individuation Reply to Mertz. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):1 – 13.
Andreas Hüttemann (2007). Causation, Laws and Dispositions. In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate
Gabriele Contessa (2012). Do Extrinsic Dispositions Need Extrinsic Causal Bases? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):622-638.
Elizabeth Prior, Robert Pargetter & Frank Jackson (1982). Three Theses About Dispositions. American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3):251-257.
Simon W. Blackburn (1990). Filling in Space. Analysis 50 (2):62-5.
Martin Schmidt (2008). On Spacetime, Points, and Bare Particulars. Metaphysica 9 (1):69-77.
Toby Handfield (2009). The Metaphysics of Dispositions and Causes. In Dispositions and Causes. Clarendon Press 1--30.
Bradley Rives (2005). Why Dispositions Are (Still) Distinct From Their Bases and Causally Impotent. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):19 - 31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads88 ( #47,539 of 1,906,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?