Voles, vasopressin, and infidelity: a molecular basis for monogamy, a platform for ethics, and more?
Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):521-543 (2012)
| Abstract | Voles are attracting attention because genetic variation at a single locus appears to have a profound impact on a complex social behavior, namely monogamy. After briefly reviewing the state of the most relevant scientific literature, I examine the way that this research gets taken up by the popular media, by scientists, and by the notable philosopher of neuroscience Patricia Churchland and interpreted as having deeply revisionary implications for how we ordinarily understand ourselves as persons. We have all these big questions we would like to resolve about free will, consciousness, our understanding of persons, and the nature of morality and there is a tendency to ask more of neuroscience than it can yet answer. I do not deny that advances in neuroscience may eventually bear on important philosophical issues. However, it is not at all clear that this research has many of the sweeping implications being claimed for it and, in communicating science responsibly to the public, there is reason to be cautious about suggesting that it does. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Churchland, Patricia Free will Neuroethics Oxytocin Vasopressin Voles Science and Culture | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel S. Levine (2005). Is All Affiliation the Same? Facilitation or Complementarity? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):356-357.
Patricia S. Greenspan (1993). Free Will and the Genome Project. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1):31-43.
Patricia S. Churchland (1986). Replies to Comments to Symposium on Patricia Smith Churchland's Neurophilosophy. Inquiry 29 (June):241-272.
Patricia Smith Churchland (2002). Brain Wise. The MIT Press.
Katrina Sifferd (2011). Neuroethics. In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2e. Elsevier.
Paul M. Churchland & Patricia S. Churchland (2003). Recent Work on Consciousness: Philosophical, Theoretical, and Empirical. In Naoyuki Osaka (ed.), Neural Basis of Consciousness. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
C. S. Carter, K. L. Bales & S. W. Porges (2005). Neuropeptides Influence Expression of and Capacity to Form Social Bonds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):353-354.
Patricia S. Churchland (1982). Mind-Brain Reduction: New Light From Philosophy of Science. Neuroscience 7:1041-7.
Patricia S. Churchland (1990). Is Neuroscience Relevant to Philosophy? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 323:323-341.
Chris Kaposy (2009). Will Neuroscientific Discoveries About Free Will and Selfhood Change Our Ethical Practices? Neuroethics 2 (1).
Patricia S. Churchland (1988). Reduction and the Neurobiological Basis of Consciousness. In Anthony J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford University Press.
Gunther S. Stent (1990). The Poverty of Neurophilosophy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):539-557.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-11Total downloads19 ( #64,458 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
