A proposed non-consequentialist policy for the ethical distribution of scarce vaccination in the face of an influenza pandemic
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):317-318 (2012)
|Abstract||The current UK policy for the distribution of scarce vaccination in an influenza pandemic is ethically dubious. It is based on the planned outcome of the maximum health benefit in terms of the saving of lives and the reduction of illness. To that end, the population is classified in terms of particular priority groups. An alternative policy with a non-consequentialist rationale is proposed in the present work. The state should give the vaccination, in the first instance, to those who are at risk of catching the pandemic flu in the line of their duties of public employment. Thereafter, if there is not sufficient vaccine to give all citizens equally an effective dose, the state should give all citizens an equal chance of receiving an effective dose. This would be the just thing to do because the state has a duty to treat each and all of its citizens impartially and they have a corresponding right to such impartial treatment. Although this article specifically refers to the UK, it is considered that the suggested alternative policy would be applicable generally. The duty to act justly is not merely a local one|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. Kaposy & N. Bandrauk (2012). Prioritizing Vaccine Access for Vulnerable but Stigmatized Groups. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):283-295.
Marcel Verweij (2009). Moral Principles for Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in an Influenza Pandemic. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):159--169.
Lori Uscher-Pines, Patrick S. Duggan, Joshua P. Garoon, Ruth A. Karron & Ruth R. Faden (2007). Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups. Hastings Center Report 37 (4):32-39.
Matthew K. Wynia (2006). Ethics and Public Health Emergencies: Rationing Vaccines. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):4 – 7.
A. Wardrope (2012). Scarce Vaccine Supplies in an Influenza Pandemic Should Not Be Distributed Randomly: Reply to McLachlan. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):765-767.
J. M. Tchuenche, S. A. Khamis, F. B. Agusto & S. C. Mpeshe (2011). Optimal Control and Sensitivity Analysis of an Influenza Model with Treatment and Vaccination. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):1-28.
Alison Thompson, Karen Faith, Jennifer Gibson & Ross Upshur (2006). Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: An Ethical Framework to Guide Decision-Making. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-11.
Martin Peterson (2008). The Moral Importance of Selecting People Randomly. Bioethics 22 (6):321–327.
Jaro Kotalik (2005). Preparing for an Influenza Pandemic: Ethical Issues. Bioethics 19 (4):422–431.
Re'em Segev (2005). Well-Being and Fairness in the Distribution of Scarce Health Resources. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):231 – 260.
J. Luyten, A. Vandevelde, P. Van Damme & P. Beutels (2011). Vaccination Policy and Ethical Challenges Posed by Herd Immunity, Suboptimal Uptake and Subgroup Targeting. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):280-291.
H. Draper, T. Sorell, J. Ives, S. Damery, S. Greenfield, J. Parry, J. Petts & S. Wilson (2010). Non-Professional Healthcare Workers and Ethical Obligations to Work During Pandemic Influenza. Public Health Ethics 3 (1):23-34.
Nimalan Arinaminpathy, J. Savulescu & Angela R. Mclean (2009). Effective Use of a Limited Antiviral Stockpile for Pandemic Influenza. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):171-179.
Anne Moates (2005). Risk to Human Health Posed by Avian Influenza. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (2):1.
Added to index2012-03-13
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?