Assessing the Construct Validity of the Global 100 Sustainability Ranking for Schools of Business
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:274-286 (2011)
| Abstract | Colleges of business rankings purport to address relative performance on programs such as sustainability. The primary criticism of rankings is that providers have not established reliability or validity of the ranking. This study examines whether The Global 100 sustainability ranking is sufficiently unique to claim that it is based on attributes not used for non-sustainability ranking (divergent validity) and whether it is appropriately related to independent characteristics expected to measure this attribute (convergent validity) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFranz Huber (2006). Ranking Functions and Rankings on Languages. Artificial Intelligence 170:462-471.
Lisa Jones Christensen, Ellen Peirce, Laura P. Hartman, W. Michael Hoffman & Jamie Carrier (2007). Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics 73 (4):347 - 368.
Georg Brun & Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (2007). Ranking Policy Options for Sustainable Development. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):15-31.
Lawrence J. Lad (2010). The Food Industry and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:121-123.
Joseph Tainter (2003). A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
Douglas W. Portmore (2008). Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):409 - 427.
Matias Laine (2007). Sustainable Development? Business Rhetoric of Sustainability in Finnish Corporate Disclosures 1985-2005. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:197-202.
Harald Bergsteiner & Gayle C. Avery (2012). When Ethics Are Compromised by Ideology: The Global Competitiveness Report. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):391-410.
Kathia Laszlo (2003). The Evolution of Business: Learning, Innovation, and Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century. World Futures 59 (8):605 – 614.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3).
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):107 - 119.
Robert Sugden (2009). On Modelling Vagueness—and on Not Modelling Incommensurability. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):95-113.
Jacob Park (2007). China's Rapid Industrialization and its Sustainability Discontents. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:365-375.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-09-18Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
