David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:274-286 (2011)
Colleges of business rankings purport to address relative performance on programs such as sustainability. The primary criticism of rankings is that providers have not established reliability or validity of the ranking. This study examines whether The Global 100 sustainability ranking is sufficiently unique to claim that it is based on attributes not used for non-sustainability ranking (divergent validity) and whether it is appropriately related to independent characteristics expected to measure this attribute (convergent validity)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Franz Huber (2006). Ranking Functions and Rankings on Languages. Artificial Intelligence 170:462-471.
Lisa Jones Christensen, Ellen Peirce, Laura P. Hartman, W. Michael Hoffman & Jamie Carrier (2007). Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 73 (4):347 - 368.
Georg Brun & Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (2008). Ranking Policy Options for Sustainable Development. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):15-31.
Lawrence J. Lad (2010). The Food Industry and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:121-123.
Joseph Tainter (2003). A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
Jacob Park (unknown). China's Rapid Industrialization and its Sustainability Discontents: Understanding the Strategic Implications for Business. Philosophical Explorations:365-375.
Douglas W. Portmore (2008). Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):409 - 427.
Matias Laine (2007). Sustainable Development? Business Rhetoric of Sustainability in Finnish Corporate Disclosures 1985-2005. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:197-202.
Harald Bergsteiner & Gayle C. Avery (2012). When Ethics Are Compromised by Ideology: The Global Competitiveness Report. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):391-410.
Kathia Laszlo (2003). The Evolution of Business: Learning, Innovation, and Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century. World Futures 59 (8):605 – 614.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):107-119.
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):107 - 119.
Robert Sugden (2009). On Modelling Vagueness—and on Not Modelling Incommensurability. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):95-113.
Jacob Park (2007). China's Rapid Industrialization and its Sustainability Discontents. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:365-375.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads1 ( #459,101 of 1,101,769 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,769 )
How can I increase my downloads?