David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):313-326 (2011)
The reality of an ageing Europe has called attention to the importance of e-inclusion for a growing population of senior citizens. For some, this may mean closing the digital divide by providing access and support to technologies that increase citizen participation; for others, e-inclusion means access to assistive technologies to facilitate and extend their living independently. These initiatives address a social need and provide economic opportunities for European industry. While undoubtedly desirable, and supported by European Union initiatives, several cultural assumptions or issues related to the initiatives could benefit from fuller examination, as could their practical and ethical implications. This paper begins to consider these theoretical and practical concerns. The first part of the paper examines cultural issues and assumptions relevant to adopting e-technologies, and the ethical principles applied to them. These include (1) the persistence of ageism, even in e-inclusion; (2) different approaches to, and implications of independent living; and (3) the values associated with different ethical principles, given their implications for accountability to older users. The paper then discusses practical issues and ethical concerns that have been raised by the use of smart home and monitoring technologies with older persons. Understanding these assumptions and their implications will allow for more informed choices in promoting ethical application of e-solutions for older persons.
|Keywords||Ageism Cultural assumptions E-inclusion Ethics Senior citizens Smart home and monitoring technologies Views on independent living Western views of ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
N. Rose (2001). The Politics of Life Itself. Theory, Culture and Society 18 (6):1-30.
George J. Agich (2003). Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age an Ethical Framework for Long-Term Care. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Thomas R. Cole (1983). The 'Enlightened' View of Aging: Victorian Morality in a New Key. Hastings Center Report 13 (3):34-40.
Nikolas S. Rose (1999). Powers of Freedom Reframing Political Thought. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Novitzky, Alan F. Smeaton, Cynthia Chen, Kate Irving, Tim Jacquemard, Fiachra O’Brolcháin, Dónal O’Mathúna & Bert Gordijn (2015). A Review of Contemporary Work on the Ethics of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for People with Dementia. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):707-765.
Similar books and articles
Emilio Mordini, David Wright, Kush Wadhwa, Paul De Hert, Eugenio Mantovani, Jesper Thestrup, Guido Van Steendam, Antonio D’Amico & Ira Vater (2009). Senior Citizens and the Ethics of E-Inclusion. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):203-220.
David Wright Emilio Mordini, Paul Hert Kush Wadhwdea, Jesper Thestrup Eugenio Mantovani, Antonio D'Amico Guido Van Steendam & Ira Vater (2009). Senior Citizens and the Ethics of E-Inclusion. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3).
Josh McGuire (2009). Ethical Considerations When Working with Older Adults in Psychology. Ethics and Behavior 19 (2):112 – 128.
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics 1 (4):20-38.
David Wright & Kush Wadhwa (2010). Mainstreaming the E-Excluded in Europe: Strategies, Good Practices and Some Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):139-156.
A. Vaccaro & P. Madsen (2009). Ict and an Ngo: Difficulties in Attempting to Be Extremely Transparent. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):221-231.
Don Sherratt, Simon Rogerson & N. Ben Fairweather (2005). The Challenge of Raising Ethical Awareness: A Case-Based Aiding System for Use by Computing and ICT Students. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):299-315.
Robin S. Dillon (2010). Respect for Persons, Identity, and Information Technology. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):17-28.
Bernd Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Issues, Concepts and Methods Relating to the Identification of the Ethics of Emerging ICTs. Communications of the IIMA 10 (1):33-43.
Allen E. Buchanan, Andrea Califano, Jeffrey Kahn, Elizabeth McPherson, John A. Robertson & Baruch A. Brody (2002). Pharmacogenetics: Ethical Issues and Policy Options. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):1-15.
William P. Cordeiro (1997). Suggested Management Responses to Ethical Issues Raised by Technological Change. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1393-1400.
G. M. A. Hussein (2010). When Ethics Survive Where People Do Not. Public Health Ethics 3 (1):72-77.
Kate Millar & Sandy Tomkins (2007). Ethical Analysis of the Use of GM Fish: Emerging Issues for Aquaculture Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):437-453.
Harlan Lane & Michael Grodin (1997). Ethical Issues in Cochlear Implant Surgery: An Exploration Into Disease, Disability, and the Best Interests of the Child. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):231-251.
Added to index2011-11-05
Total downloads16 ( #163,912 of 1,725,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,103 of 1,725,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?