David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 21 (1):1-14 (2006)
The feminist literature against the commodification of embryos in human embryo research includes an argument to the effect that embryos are "intimately connected" to persons, or morally inalienable from them. We explore why embryos might be inalienable to persons and why feminists might find this view appealing. But, ultimately, as feminists, we reject this view because it is inconsistent with full respect for women's reproductive autonomy and with a feminist conception of persons as relational, embodied beings. Overall, feminists should avoid claims about embryos' being inalienable to persons in arguments for or against the commodification of human embryos.
|Keywords||reproductive autonomy women embryos commodification inalienability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sandra Lee Bartky (1982). Narcissism, Femininity and Alienation. Social Theory and Practice 8 (2):127-143.
Susan J. Brison (1996). Outliving Oneself: Trauma, Memory and Personal Identity. In Diana T. Meyers (ed.), Feminists Rethink the Self (Feminist Theory and Politics Series). Westview Press.
Cynthia B. Cohen (1999). Selling Bits and Pieces of Humans to Make Babies: The Gift of the Magi Revisited. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):288 – 306.
Donna L. Dickenson (2001). Property and Women's Alienation From Their Own Reproductive Labour. Bioethics 15 (3):205–217.
A. Donchin (1996). Feminist Critiques of New Fertility Technologies: Implications for Social Policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5):475-498.
Citations of this work BETA
Donna L. Dickenson (2013). The Commercialization of Human Eggs in Mitochondrial Replacement Research. New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body 19 (1):18-29.
Similar books and articles
Erica Haimes & Ken Taylor (2011). The Contributions of Empirical Evidence to Socio-Ethical Debates on Fresh Embryo Donation for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Bioethics 25 (6):334-341.
Stephen S. Hanson (2006). “More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Mark Moller (2009). Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Discarded Embryo Argument. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
P. Tully (2011). Researchers and Firing Squads: Questions Concerning the Use of Frozen Human Embryos. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):516-528.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Embryo Rescue Case. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2006). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos. Journal of Philosophical Research (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Aaron Simmons (2012). Do Embryos Have Interests? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris (2005). Stem Cell Research, Personhood and Sentience. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10:68-75.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2005). On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
E. Christian Brugger (2009). “Other Selves”: Moral and Legal Proposals Regarding the Personhood of Cryopreserved Human Embryos. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):105-129.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #75,316 of 1,679,437 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #29,200 of 1,679,437 )
How can I increase my downloads?