Incontinent Belief

Abstract
Alfred Mele has recentIy attempted to direct attention to a neglected species of irrational belief which he calls ‘incontinent belief’. He has devoted a paper and an entire chapter (chapter eight) of his book, Irrationality (Oxford University Press, 1987) to explaining its logical possibility. In what follows, I will appeal to familiar facts about the difference between belief and action to make a case that it is entirely unproblematic that incontinent belief is logically possible. In the process, I will call into question the philosophical intercst of incontinent belief. If what I say is correct, incontinent belief does not warrant the attention of philosophers of mind
Keywords epistemic akrasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,825
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele (1991). Incontinent Belief. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:197-212.
David Hunter (2011). Alienated Belief. Dialectica 65 (2):221-240.
Alfred R. Mele (1986). Incontinent Believing. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (143):212-222.
António Zilhão (2010). Incontinence, Honouring Sunk Costs and Rationality. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), Epsa Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer. 303--310.
Robert Audi (1990). Weakness of Will and Rational Action. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (3):270 – 281.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim (Only) at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Andrew Chignell, The Ethics of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alfred R. Mele (1986). Is Akratic Action Unfree? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (4):673-679.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

4 ( #264,559 of 1,100,049 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #304,128 of 1,100,049 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.