David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):239-264 (2004)
I argue that the Aristotelian definition of motion,“the act of what exists potentially insofar as it exists potentially,” and the mover causality principle,“whatever is moved is moved by another,” are compatible with Newton’s First Law of Motion, which treats inertialmotion as a state equivalent to rest and which requires no sustaining mover for such motion. Both traditions treat motion as such as requiring an initial, generating mover but not necessarily a sustaining motor. Through examining examples of motion as treated by Newtonian physics, and through arguing that potential energy is Aristotelian potentiality, I argue that the First Law is understandable according to the Aristotelian definition as an incomplete act with a twofold ordination of the same potentiality. I then propose that, through the notion of spacetime, Special and General Relativity instantiate motion as a unity of differentiated prior and posterior parts that do not coexist in reality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas J. McLaughlin (2008). Nature and Inertia. Review of Metaphysics 62 (2):251-284.
John Aidun (1982). Aristotelian Force as Newtonian Power. Philosophy of Science 49 (2):228-235.
Christoph Hoerl (2012). Seeing Motion and Apparent Motion. European Journal of Philosophy (2).
Jan Westerhoff (2008). Nāgārjuna's Arguments on Motion Revisited. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (4):455-479.
Jerzy Gołosz (2002). Ruch, przestrzeń, czas. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Stephen Menn (1990). Descartes and Some Predecessors on the Divine Conservation of Motion. Synthese 83 (2):215 - 238.
Fabio Zanin (2006). Francis of Marchia, Virtus Derelicta, and Modifications of the Basic Principles of Aristotelian Physics. Vivarium 44 (1):81-95.
Ori Belkind (2007). Newton's Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.
Phillip Bricker (1990). Absolute Time Vs. Absolute Motion. In Phillip Bricker & R. I. G. Hughes (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science. MIT Press.
Robert Rynasiewicz (2000). On the Distinction Between Absolute and Relative Motion. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):70-93.
John David Rhodes & Elena Gorfinkel (eds.) (2011). Taking Place: Location and the Moving Image. University of Minnesota Press.
Oded Balaban (1995). The Modern Misunderstanding of Aristotle's Theory of Motion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):1 - 10.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads29 ( #59,116 of 1,098,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,097 of 1,098,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?