On a similarity between natural law theories and English legal positivism
Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):445-462 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilfrid J. Waluchow (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2011). The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Thom Brooks (2005). Hegel's Ambiguous Contribution to Legal Theory. Res Publica 11 (1).
Robert P. George (ed.) (1996). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Mario Jori (ed.) (1992). Legal Positivism. New York University Press.
Anthony James Sebok (1998). Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press.
Stig Jørgensen (1978). Values in Law: Ideas, Principles and Rules. Juristforbundet.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Thom Brooks (2007). Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory. Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads33 ( #36,617 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
