David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85 (67):239-262 (2010)
In Reference and Consciousness, John Campbell attempts to a make a case that what he calls of visual experience, a view that he champions, is superior to what he calls . I argue that his attempt fails. In section 1, I spell out the two views. In section 2, I outline Campbell's case that the Relational View is superior to the Representational View and offer a diagnosis of where Campbell goes wrong. In section 3, I examine the case in detail and argue that it fails. Finally, in section 4, I mention two very well-known problems for the Relational View that are unresolved in the book
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tyler Burge (1991). Vision and Intentional Content. In Ernest LePore & Robert Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and His Critics. Blackwell.
J. Campbell (2002). Reference and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
William Child (1994). Causality, Interpretation, and the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Fred Dretske (1995). Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Adam Pautz (2011). Can Disjunctivists Explain Our Access to the Sensible World? Philosophical Issues 21 (1):384-433.
Similar books and articles
Craig French (2013). Perceptual Experience and Seeing That P. Synthese 190 (10):1735-1751.
Thomas Raleigh (2013). Phenomenology Without Representation. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3).
James Genone (2014). Appearance and Illusion. Mind 123 (490):339-376.
Richard Wollheim (2003). What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):131–147.
Michael Tye (2009). The Admissible Contents of Visual Experience. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):541-562.
Susanna Schellenberg (2010). The Particularity and Phenomenology of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):19 - 48.
Susanna Schellenberg (2011). Perceptual Content Defended. Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750.
Robert Hopkins (2003). What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):149–167.
Clare Batty (2010). A Representational Account of Olfactory Experience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):511-538.
John Schwenkler (2014). Vision, Self‐Location, and the Phenomenology of the 'Point of View'. Noûs 48 (1):137-155.
Ron McClamrock (2013). Visual Consciousness and The Phenomenology of Perception. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):63-68.
Michael Tye (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. MIT Press.
Paul Coates (2009). The Multiple Contents of Experience. Philosophical Topics 37 (1):25-47.
Ned Block (2005). Bodily Sensations as an Obstacle for Representationism. In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press. 137-142.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads78 ( #17,801 of 1,102,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #21,297 of 1,102,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?