Corporate accountability in australia: Managing the information environment for corporate accountability [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):673 - 681 (1995)
Accountability is a significant factor in the soundness of the organisational environment in Australia, for both the public and private sectors. The accountability process rests on the quality and accessibility of organisational records, the information environment. While the Australian liberal democratic open society and free market system relies on accountability, paradoxically accountability is constrained by the needs of the open society and the market. Setting appropriate mechanisms for accountability while preserving civil liberty and innovative free markets is a difficult task, and is one that falls to government. Governments have a ubiquitous role in implementing accountability in both the public and the private sectors, and the Australian federal system further complicates governments'' difficult role. The 1990s will bring further corporate pathologies, similar to those of the 1980''s. However the public and private sectors can reduce the impact of corporate pathologies in the 1990''s by learning the lessons of the 1980''s, through placing a priority on inculcating ethical and moral behavior, emphasising democratic values, and raising the organisational status of records.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
N. Craig Smith (1991). Morality and the Market: Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):881-882.
Citations of this work BETA
Bahram Soltani (2014). The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals. Journal of Business Ethics 120 (2):251-274.
Similar books and articles
Mary Lyn Stoll (2008). Backlash Hits Business Ethics: Finding Effective Strategies for Communicating the Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):17 - 24.
Oliver F. Williams (2004). The UN Global Compact. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (4):755-774.
Olufemi Amao & Kenneth Amaeshi (2008). Galvanising Shareholder Activism: A Prerequisite for Effective Corporate Governance and Accountability in Nigeria. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):119 - 130.
Peter Pruzan (1998). From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1379-1394.
Sandra Waddock (2004). Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):313-327.
Jens Steffek (2010). Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):45-68.
Simon Zadek (1998). Balancing Performance, Ethics, and Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1421-1442.
William E. Shafer (2006). Social Paradigms and Attitudes Toward Environmental Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (2):121 - 147.
Vassilios P. Filios (1985). Assessment of Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Accountability in Britain. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (3):155 - 173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #214,557 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #317,270 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?