David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):181 - 191 (1986)
Authors of books on business ethics and corporate social responsibility fall into two general approaches when they answer the question: Why should a business firm, which represents private property, have greater obligations to the local community than an ordinary citizen? Authors generally subscribe to a rights approach or to a power model. This paper will present four rights approaches and three power models which are used to describe the relationship of the firm to society. Introducing these different approaches and models will be two brief expositions which provide the setting for determining the relationship of a firm to society. The first traces two lines to the development of the contemporary American corporation. The second views the business corporation as a quasi-public institution.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adaeze Okoye (2009). Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):613 - 627.
Douglas R. Robideaux, Morgan P. Miles & John B. White (1993). Codes of Ethics and Firm Size: A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Planning. International Journal of Value-Based Management 6 (1):49-60.
Similar books and articles
Irene Goll & Abdul A. Rasheed (2004). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):41-54.
Khaled Elsayed (2006). Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):297 - 308.
Daisuke Okamoto (2009). Social Relationship of a Firm and the Csp–Cfp Relationship in Japan: Using Artificial Neural Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):117 - 132.
Bryan W. Husted & David B. Allen (2007). Corporate Social Strategy in Multinational Enterprises: Antecedents and Value Creation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):345 - 361.
William C. Frederick (2004). The Evolutionary Firm and Its Moral (Dis)Contents. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:145-176.
Peter A. Stanwick & Sarah D. Stanwick (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204.
Salme Näsi & Hannele Mäkelä (2010). Incorporating Stakeholder Thinking Into the Neo-Classical Capital Circulation Model of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):51-56.
Louis H. Amato & Christie H. Amato (2012). Retail Philanthropy: Firm Size, Industry, and Business Cycle. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):435-448.
Jeremy Galbreath (2006). Are Organisation Researchers Too Obsessed with the Economic Responsibility of the Firm? Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):287 - 295.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #230,090 of 1,102,971 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #183,254 of 1,102,971 )
How can I increase my downloads?