David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 154 (2):223-240 (2011)
Recently, some philosophers have suggested that a form of robust realism about ethics, or normativity more generally, does not face a significant explanatory burden in metaphysics. I call this view metaphysically quietist normative realism . This paper argues that while this view can appear to constitute an attractive alternative to more traditional forms of normative realism, it cannot deliver on this promise. I examine Scanlon’s attempt to defend such a quietist realism, and argue that rather than silencing metaphysical questions about normative reasons, his defense at best succeeds only in shifting the focus of metaphysical enquiry. I then set aside the details of Scanlon’s view, and argue on general grounds that that the quietist realist cannot finesse a crucial metanormative task: to explain the contrast between the correct normative system and alternative putatively normative standards.
|Keywords||Metaethics Metanormative quietism Metanormative realism Normativity Reasons Scanlon|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Michael Smith (1994). The Moral Problem. Blackwell.
Derek Parfit (2011). On What Matters. Oxford University Press.
Mark Andrew Schroeder (2007). Slaves of the Passions. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tristram McPherson (2015). What is at Stake in Debates Among Normative Realists? Noûs 49 (1):123-146.
Ramon Das (2016). Evolutionary Debunking of Morality: Epistemological or Metaphysical? Philosophical Studies 173 (2):417-435.
David Plunkett (2015). Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy. Inquiry 58 (7-8):828-874.
Billy Dunaway (2015). Supervenience Arguments and Normative Non‐Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (3):627-655.
Kevin Toh (2013). Jurisprudential Theories and First‐Order Legal Judgments. Philosophy Compass 8 (5):457-471.
Similar books and articles
Nick Zangwill (2009). Normativity and the Metaphysics of Mind. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):1–19.
Karl Schafer (2010). Evolution and Normative Scepticism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):471-488.
David Enoch (2003). An Argument for Robust Metanormative Realism. Dissertation, New York University
Krist Vaesen (2006). How Norms in Technology Ought to Be Interpreted. Techne 10 (1):117-133.
Edmund N. Santurri (2005). Global Justice After the Fall Christian Realism and the “Law of Peoples”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):783-814.
David Enoch (2010). The Epistemological Challenge to Metanormative Realism: How Best to Understand It, and How to Cope with It. Philosophical Studies 148 (3):413-438.
Nick Zangwill (2011). Non-Cognitivism and Consistency. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 65 (4):465-484.
Michael Pendlebury (2010). How to Be a Normative Expressivist. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):182-207.
David Enoch (2011). Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford University Press.
Mark Schroeder (2005). Realism and Reduction: The Quest for Robustness. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (1):1-18.
Added to index2010-03-13
Total downloads435 ( #4,060 of 1,926,208 )
Recent downloads (6 months)67 ( #5,089 of 1,926,208 )
How can I increase my downloads?