Mark Schroeder's Hypotheticalism: agent-neutrality, moral epistemology, and methodology [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 157 (3):445-453 (2012)
Abstract
Symposium contribution on Mark Schroeder's Slaves of the Passions. Argues that Schroeder's account of agent-neutral reasons cannot be made to work, that the limited scope of his distinctive proposal in the epistemology of reasons undermines its plausibility, and that Schroeder faces an uncomfortable tension between the initial motivation for his view and the details of the view he develops.
Keywords Humean theory of reasons  Agent neutral reasons  Moral epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Tristram McPherson, Mark Schroeder's Hypotheticalism: agent-neutrality, moral epistemology, and methodology
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Daan Evers (2009). Humean Agent-Neutral Reasons? Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):55 – 67.
Paulina Sliwa (2012). In Defense of Moral Testimony. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):175-195.
John MacFarlane (2011). Simplicity Made Difficult. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 156 (3):441 - 448.
Derk Pereboom (2012). On Fischer's Our Stories. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):523-528.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-18

Total downloads

74 ( #19,087 of 1,102,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #11,124 of 1,102,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.