David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Derrida Today 5 (1):119-130 (2008)
How might we begin to think about deconstruction in relation to the formulation of political policy? Once we begin to ask this question the whole idea of policy as such is put in question and conversely the limitations of philosophy as the basis for political decision making quickly become apparent. Through a consideration of this problem and by reference to a number of key tropes in Derrida's later writings, this essay begins the task of thinking about the deconstruction of policy and of asking what the future role of deconstructive thought might be
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martin McQuillan (2009). Extra Time and the Death Penalties: On a Newly Arisen Violent Tone in Philosophy. Derrida Today 2 (2):133-150.
Similar books and articles
Christine Winter (2006). Doing Justice to Geography in the Secondary School: Deconstruction, Invention and the National Curriculum. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (2):212 - 229.
Joshua Kates (2008). Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction. Fordham University Press.
Patrick O'Connor (2007). Derrida's Worldly Responsibility. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):303-334.
Adrian Costache (2011). On the Philosophical Styles of the Times: Some Questions Concerning the Meaning of Deconstruction. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):20-29.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads19 ( #100,928 of 1,410,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,552 of 1,410,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?