Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Progress in emergency and critical care requires that clinical research be performed on patients who are incapable of granting consent for research participation. Analyses of the ethics of such research have left some questions incompletely answered. Why should we be permitted to expose vulnerable patients to research risks without their consent? In particular, how do we justify research interventions that have no potential benefit for participants (nontherapeutic interventions)? This article presents a moral justification for nontherapeutic interventions in emergency research. By relying on a framework for assessing research risks, and by drawing on the example of pediatric research, this justification is founded in how institutional review boards, and society in general, analyze risk. Our justification for emergency research also suggests additional protections for emergency research participants, including a stringent threshold for research risk, that still permit important research to proceed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer, Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.
Kenneth V. Iserson (2007). Has Emergency Medicine Research Benefited Patients? An Ethical Question. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):289-295.
David Wendler (2012). A New Justification for Pediatric Research Without the Potential for Clinical Benefit. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):23 - 31.
Ritva Halila (2007). Assessing the Ethics of Medical Research in Emergency Settings: How Do International Regulations Work in Practice? Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):305-313.
Eugenijus Gefenas (2007). Balancing Ethical Principles in Emergency Medicine Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):281-288.
Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer, U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.
Piotr S. Iwanowski (2007). Informed Consent Procedure for Clinical Trials in Emergency Settings: The Polish Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):333-336.
Søren Holm (2011). Withdrawing From Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller, When Are Research Risks Reasonable in Relation to Anticipated Benefits?
Marion Danis (ed.) (2012). Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Michelle H. Biros (2007). Research Without Consent: Exception From and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Added to index2010-09-08
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 738,450 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,450 )
How can I increase my downloads?