David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 6 (3):303-324 (1991)
The consensus among evolutionists seems to be that the morphological complexity of organisms increases in evolution, although almost no empirical evidence for such a trend exists. Most studies of complexity have been theoretical, and the few empirical studies have not, with the exception of certain recent ones, been especially rigorous; reviews are presented of both the theoretical and empirical literature. The paucity of evidence raises the question of what sustains the consensus, and a number of suggestions are offered, including the possibility that certain cultural and/or perceptual biases are at work. In addition, a shift in emphasis from theoretical to empirical inquiry is recommended for the study of complexity, and guidelines for future empirical studies are proposed.
|Keywords||Complexity entropy evolution evolutionary trends Herbert Spencer progress|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. R. Brooks (1988). Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. University of Chicago Press.
F. Ayala & T. Dobzhansky (eds.) (1974). Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. University of California Press.
Herbert Spencer (1945). First Principles. Greenwood Press.
Joseph Needham (1936). Order and Life. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
J. Maynard Smith (1972). Time in the Evolutionary Process. In J. T. Fraser, F. Haber & G. Muller (eds.), The Study of Time. Springer-Verlag 1.
Citations of this work BETA
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2012). Interweaving Categories: Styles, Paradigms, and Models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):628-639.
Angela Potochnik & Brian McGill (2012). The Limitations of Hierarchical Organization. Philosophy of Science 79 (1):120-140.
Jesper Hoffmeyer (2010). A Biosemiotic Approach to the Question of Meaning. Zygon 45 (2):367-390.
Adrian Mitchell Currie (2013). Narratives, Mechanisms and Progress in Historical Science. Synthese 191 (6):1-21.
Derek D. Turner (2014). Philosophical Issues in Recent Paleontology. Philosophy Compass 9 (7):494-505.
Similar books and articles
Donna Coch & Kurt W. Fischer (1998). Discontinuity and Variability in Relational Complexity: Cognitive and Brain Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):834-835.
Kevin Korb & Alan Dorin (2011). Evolution Unbound: Releasing the Arrow of Complexity. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):317-338.
Börje Ekstig (2011). Biological and Cultural Evolution in a Common Universal Trend of Increasing Complexity. World Futures 66 (6):435-448.
Peter Stewart (2001). Complexity Theories, Social Theory, and the Question of Social Complexity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):323-360.
Bruce Edmonds (1995). What is Complexity? - The Philosophy of Complexity Per Se with Application to Some Examples in Evolution. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Guy van Orden & Damian G. Stephen (2012). Is Cognitive Science Usefully Cast as Complexity Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):3-6.
Daniel W. McShea (2000). Functional Complexity in Organisms: Parts as Proxies. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):641-668.
Börje Ekstig (2010). Complexity and Evolution: A Study of the Growth of Complexity in Organic and Cultural Evolution. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (3):263-278.
Peter Jedlicka (2007). Physical Complexity and Cognitive Evolution. In Carlos Gershenson, Diederik Aerts & Bruce Edmonds (eds.), Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. World Scientific 221--231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #92,559 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #98,230 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?