Graduate students' experiences in dealing with impaired Peer, compared with faculty predictions: An exploratory study
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):191 – 202 (1991)
In this study, we present data on graduate students' actual experiences in dealing with impaired peers and faculty predictions of how students would deal with such situations. A total of 29 faculty and 73 graduate students responded to a survey of 40 randomly selected clinical psychology training programs. Student respondents were almost universally (95%) aware of peers whom they regarded as impaired in their professional functioning, and half (49%) the sample reported being aware of a peer's ethical impropriety. Faculty overestimated the number of students who said they "did nothing" when confronted with the resulting ethical dilemma and underestimated the degree of conflict and turmoil (i.e., anger, frustration, dismay) that students reported experiencing. Faculty also estimated that students would be more concerned with peer loyalty issues, whereas students indicated that they were strongly motivated by ethical considerations. Ethics curricula ought more thoroughly to address affective concerns through experiential learning vehicles such as faculty modeling, simulation exercises, and small-group discussion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Corrine R. Sackett (2010). Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Valerie A. Wajda-Johnston, Paul J. Handal, Peter A. Brawer & Anthony N. Fabricatore (2001). Academic Dishonesty at the Graduate Level. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):287 – 305.
Klaus Issler & Ted W. Ward (1989). Moral Development as a Curriculum Emphasis in American Protestant Theological Education. Journal of Moral Education 18 (2):131-143.
Keren Lehavot (2009). “Myspace” or Yours? The Ethical Dilemma of Graduate Students' Personal Lives on the Internet. Ethics and Behavior 19 (2):129 – 141.
Cynthia D. Rittenhouse (1996). Survival Skills and Ethics Training for Graduate Students: A Graduate Student Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):367-380.
Robert E. Stevens, O. Jeff Harris & Stan Williamson (1993). A Comparison of Ethical Evaluations of Business School Faculty and Students: A Pilot Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (8):611 - 619.
Sarah E. Oberlander & Jeffrey E. Barnett (2005). Multiple Relationships Between Graduate Assistants and Students: Ethical and Practical Considerations. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):49 – 63.
Georgiana Shick Tryon (2001). School Psychology Students' Beliefs About Their Preparation and Concern with Ethical Issues. Ethics and Behavior 11 (4):375 – 394.
Priscilla O'Clock & Marilyn Okleshen (1993). A Comparison of Ethical Perceptions of Business and Engineering Majors. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):677 - 687.
Melissa S. Anderson, Elo Charity Oju & Tina M. R. Falkner (2001). Help From Faculty: Findings From the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):487-503.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #368,438 of 1,696,508 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #342,645 of 1,696,508 )
How can I increase my downloads?