The philosophies of Royce, James, and Dewey in their american setting
International Journal of Ethics 40 (2):211-231 (1930)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMitchell Aboulafia, George Herbert Mead. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Edwin Smith (1992). America's Philosophical Vision. University of Chicago Press.
Max Harold Fisch (1951). Classic American Philosophers: Peirce, James, Royce, Santayana, Dewey, Whitehead; Selections From Their Writings. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Jacquelyn A. K. Kegley (2011). The "Ethical Subject/Agent" as "Rational Individual" but Also as so Much More! Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (1):116-129.
John J. Stuhr (ed.) (1987). Classical American Philosophy: Essential Readings and Interpretive Essays. Oxford University Press.
John Dewey (1910). William James. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (19):505-508.
Maurice Baum (1928). A Comparative Study of the Philosophies of William James and John Dewey. Thesis: University of Chicago.
John Dewey (1912). A Reply to Professor Royce's Critique of Instrumentalism. Philosophical Review 21 (1):69-81.
David Boersema, American Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
