Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):143–148 (2004)
|Abstract||Sue James recommends an 'enforcement account' of rights, where a right is to be understood simply as an enforceable claim. I show that adopting this analysis of rights implies giving up non-rhetorical, important, uses of the word 'right' which are possible on the best alternative theory of rights to James's position: the ability to deny a moral right's existence, even where claims are effectively enforced; the notion of a right's violation; and the idea that rights imply entitlement to make a demand, and not just enforcement of demands. Thus, adopting James's position implies giving up much more than mere rhetoric about rights|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Judith Wagner Decew (1988). Moral Rights: Conflicts and Valid Claims. Philosophical Studies 54 (1):63 - 86.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Seumas Miller (2000). Collective Rights and Minority Rights. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Louis Pojman (1991). A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism. Faith and Philosophy 8 (4):481-504.
John Edwards (2006). Rights: Foundations, Contents, Hierarchy. Res Publica 12 (3):277-293.
Jeremy Waldron (2000). The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: ``Rights'' Versus ``Needs''. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):115-135.
Susan James (2004). Rights, Moral and Enforceable: A Reply to Saladin Meckled-Garcia. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):149–153.
Susan James (2003). Rights as Enforceable Claims. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):133–147.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,414 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?