Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (4):251-268 (2009)
|Abstract||We use the construct of the “other” to explore how hate operates rhetorically within the virtual conclave of Stormfront, credited as the first hate Web site. Through the Internet, white supremacists create a rhetorical vision that resonates with those who feel marginalized by contemporary political, social, and economic forces. However, as compared to previous studies of on-line white supremacist rhetoric, we show that Stormfront discourse appears less virulent and more palatable to the naive reader. We suggest that Stormfront provides a “cyber transition” between traditional hate speech and “reasonable racism,” a tempered discourse that emphasizes pseudo-rational discussions of race, and subsequently may cast a wider net in attracting audiences|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carrie L. Hull (2003). Poststructuralism, Behaviorism and the Problem of Hate Speech. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (5):517-535.
Mark Slagle (2009). An Ethical Exploration of Free Expression and the Problem of Hate Speech. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (4):238-250.
Caleb Yong (2011). Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech? Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
David Boonin (2011). Should Race Matter?: Unusual Answers to the Usual Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Kory Schaff (2000). Hate Speech and the Problems of Agency. Social Philosophy Today 16:185-201.
Jack Kay & Priscilla Marie Meddaugh (2009). Hate Speech or “Reasonable Racism?” The Other in Stormfront. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (4):251-268.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads4 ( #189,165 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?