Locke's Militant Liberalism: A Reply to Carl Schmitt's State of Exception

History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (4):345 - 365 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carl Schmitt contends that liberal constitutionalism or the rule of law fails because it neglects the state of exception and the political, namely politics viewed as a distinction between friend and enemy groups. Yet, as a representative of liberal constitutionalism, Locke grapples with the state of exception by highlighting a magistrate prerogative and/or the right of the majority to act during a serious political crisis. Rather than neglecting the political, Locke’s state of war presupposes it. My thesis is that Schmitt’s assault against Locke’s liberal constitutionalism is one-sided, and hence Locke’s militant liberalism can disarm it. In support of my thesis I shall argue (1) that Schmitt overlooks Locke’s distinction between liberty and license; (2) that, ironically, Schmitt’s conception of politics resembles Locke’s state of war; and (3) that Locke’s liberalism is militant rather than neutral because it excludes extremists from enjoying equal civil and political rights, as reasonable citizens do, to compete for political power.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review essay: Who's afraid of Karl Schmitt.Andreas Kalyvas - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (5):87-125.
Perpetual war, or 'war and war again': Schmitt, Foucault, fascism.Mark Neocleous - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (2):47-66.
Absolute adversity: Schmitt, Levinas, and the exceptionality of killing.Jesse Sims - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (2):223-252.
The Leviathan in the state theory of Thomas Hobbes: meaning and failure of a political symbol.Carl Schmitt - 1996 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by George Schwab.
Locke's philosophy: content and context.Graham Alan John Rogers (ed.) - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law as politics: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism.David Dyzenhaus (ed.) - 1998 - Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
95 (#165,937)

6 months
6 (#201,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vicente Medina
Seton Hall University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references