David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):40-48 (2007)
After briefly summarizing Blythe Clinchy’s account of connected knowing as a knowing procedure distinguishable from separate knowing and subjectivism, I draw comparisons between it and certainfeaturesof Polanyi’s epistemology. Connected knowing and Polanyi’s indwelling have much in common. Polanyian destructive analysis comparesfavorably with separate knowing, and they concur in the detrimental restriction of knowledge to that procedure. Neither indwelling nor connected knowing should be gender-specific, though their de facto gender-specificity may be challenged along with all the other false dichotomies which are the fall-out of an overweening objectivist ideal.My own experience ofdrawing on Polanyi’s insights to shape my own teaching practices confirm and help to elucidate the implications of revised epistemology for the classroom. Also, my own work developing covenant epistemology underscores and develops the idea of connected knowing. I give practical examples of personal classroom practices. Finally, I offer further comments in response to Clinchy’s collection of quotations regarding the college classroom
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dale Cannon (2007). How Clinchy's Two Minds Might Become One Flesh. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):32-39.
Blythe McVicker Clinchy (2007). Beyond Subjectivism. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):15-31.
Zhenhua Yu (2007). Feminist Epistemology in a Polanyian Perspective. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):49-53.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
Kyle Takaki (2009). Embodied Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):26-39.
Blythe McVicker Clinchy (2007). A Response to the Responses. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):68-71.
Stephen Hetherington (2008). Knowing-That, Knowing-How, and Knowing Philosophically. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):307-324.
Refeng Tang (2011). Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Dale Cannon (2004). “Longing to Know If Our Knowing Really Is Knowing”. Tradition and Discovery 31 (3):6-20.
Tim Ray (2009). Rethinking Polanyi's Concept of Tacit Knowledge: From Personal Knowing to Imagined Institutions. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (1):75-92.
Percy Hammond (2003). Personal Knowledge and Human Creativity. Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):24-34.
Elizabeth Newman (1993). An Alternative Form of Theological Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 20 (1):13-26.
Jerry H. Gill (1980). Of Split Brains and Tacit Knowing. International Philosophical Quarterly 20 (March):49-58.
Blythe McVicker Clinchy (2007). Pursued by Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):54-67.
Joseph Shieber (2003). What Our Rylean Ancestors Knew: More on Knowing How and Knowing That. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:328-330.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?