The Lucas-Penrose Argument about Gödel's Theorem

In J. Feiser & B. Dowden (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Yesterday’s Algorithm: Penrose and the Gödel Argument.William Seager - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.
Penrose's new argument.Per Lindström - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Godel's theorem and mechanism.David Coder - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (September):234-7.
Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
McCall’s Gödelian Argument is Invalid.Panu Raatikainen - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.
Godel, Lucas, and mechanical models of mind.Robert F. Hadley - 1987 - Computational Intelligence 3:57-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
340 (#56,328)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Megill
Bentley College

Citations of this work

Remarks on the Gödelian Anti-Mechanist Arguments.Panu Raatikainen - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):267–278.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references