David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):211-223 (2006)
In this paper, I present the discussive adaptive logic DLI r . As is the case for other discussive logics, the intended application context of DLI r is the interpretation of discussions. What is new about the system is that it does not lead to explosion when some of the premises are self-contradictory. It is argued that this is important in view of the fact that human reasoners are not logically omniscient, and hence, that it may not be evident to discover the inconsistencies in one's beliefs. In addition to this, DLI r can handle cases in which different participants contradict each other. It is shown that, in both kinds of cases, DLI r leads to an interpretation of the discussion that is as rich as possible (even though no discussive connectives are introduced).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Diderik Batens, Kristof De Clercq, Peter Verdée & Joke Meheus (2009). Yes Fellows, Most Human Reasoning is Complex. Synthese 166 (1):113 - 131.
Joke Meheus (2005). Empirical Progress and Ampliative Adaptive Logics. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):193-217.
Joke Meheus (1999). Deductive and Ampliative Adaptive Logics as Tools in the Study of Creativity. Foundations of Science 4 (3):325-336.
Diderik Batens & Joke Meheus (2001). Shortcuts and Dynamic Marking in the Tableau Method for Adaptive Logics. Studia Logica 69 (2):221-248.
Diderik Batens (2007). A Universal Logic Approach to Adaptive Logics. Logica Universalis 1 (1):221-242.
Diderik Batens (2006). Narrowing Down Suspicion in Inconsistent Premise Sets. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):185-209.
Jerzy Kotas & N. C. A. Costa (1979). A New Formulation of Discussive Logic. Studia Logica 38 (4):429 - 445.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Francisco A. Doria (1995). On Jaśkowski's Discussive Logics. Studia Logica 54 (1):33 - 60.
Newton C. A. Costdaa & Francisco A. Doria (1995). On Jaśkowski's Discussive Logics. Studia Logica 54 (1).
Joke Meheus* (2006). An Adaptive Logic Based on Jaśkowskiˈs Approach to Paraconsistency. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (6):539 - 567.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #241,807 of 1,140,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,105 )
How can I increase my downloads?