David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 50 (3):215-231 (2005)
This paper argues for a view that maximizes in the Stoics' epistemology the starkness and clarity characteristic of other parts of their philosophy. I reconsider our evidence concerning doxa (opinion/belief): should we really take the Stoics to define it as assent to the incognitive, so that it does not include the assent of ordinary people to their kataleptic impressions, and is thus actually inferior to agnoia (ignorance)? I argue against this, and for the simple view that in Stoicism assent is either, in the case of the fool, doxa = agnoia, or alternatively, in that of the sage, epistêmê (knowledge). This view, together with reflection on the appropriate sense of "between" in the relevant reports of SE and Cicero, yields a sympathetic reading of an otherwise problematic challenge Sextus reports Arcesilaus as having prepared for the Stoic claim that katalêpsis, which is the criterion of truth, is between knowledge and opinion; on my view each side is proceeding in a philosophically legitimate way.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Corinne Gartner (2014). The Possibility of Psychic Conflict in Seneca's De Ira. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):213-233.
Rodrigo Sebastián Braicovich (2012). Critical Assent, Intellectualism, and Repetition in Epictetus. Apeiron 45 (4):314-337.
Similar books and articles
Constance Meinwald (2005). Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology. Phronesis 50 (3):215 - 231.
Lawrence Pasternack (2014). Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic. Kant-Studien 105 (1):41-82.
Pierre Le Morvan (2013). Why the Standard View of Ignorance Prevails. Philosophia 41 (1):239-256.
Brad Inwood & Lloyd P. Gerson (eds.) (2008). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett Pub. Co., Inc..
Rik Peels (2012). The New View on Ignorance Undefeated. Philosophia 40 (4):741-750.
Julia Annas (2007). Ethics in Stoic Philosophy. Phronesis 52 (1):58 - 87.
Rik Peels (2010). What is Ignorance? Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Sarah Wright (2012). How Boots Befooled the King: Wisdom, Truth, and the Stoics. Acta Analytica 27 (2):113-126.
John Sellars (2012). Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.
Pierre Le Morvan (2012). On Ignorance: A Vindication of the Standard View. Philosophia 40 (2):379-393.
Susanne Bobzien (1997). Stoic Conceptions of Freedom and Their Relation to Ethics. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41 (S68):71-89.
Vincent F. Hendricks (2010). Knowledge Transmissibility and Pluralistic Ignorance: A First Stab. Metaphilosophy 41 (3):279-291.
Stuart Firestein (2012). Ignorance: How It Drives Science. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads13 ( #254,909 of 1,790,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #265,702 of 1,790,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?