Inquiry 29 (1-4):29 – 43 (1986)
|Abstract||Elster's understanding of Marx is reviewed in three areas: the theory of value, the theory of history, and dialectics. In each area Elster goes astray in quite superficial ways, not instructive ones. There is a simple underlying reason in almost every case, viz. that Elster fails to confront the distinction in the philosophy of science between the methods of atomism and essentialism. Since Marx was an essentialist, Elster's attempt to assimilate Marx to the atomist tradition has as much serious interest as attempts to show that Kant was a utilitarian, Hegel a classical empiricist, or whales fishes. The conclusions are that the book is an unsympathetic treatment of Marx, that it is lacking in scholarship and balance, and that the standard of argument is unusually poor|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John M. Maguire (1978). Marx's Theory of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
John L. Stanley (1997). Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
Graeme Kirkpatrick (1994). Philosophical Foundations of Analytical Marxism. Science and Society 58 (1):34 - 52.
Norman Levine (2012). Marx's Discourse with Hegel. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arno Wouters (1993). Marx's Embryology of Society. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):149-179.
Douglass C. North (1986). Is It Worth Making Sense of Marx? Inquiry 29 (1-4):57 – 63.
Allen W. Wood (1986). Historical Materialism and Functional Explanation. Inquiry 29 (1-4):11 – 27.
Cliff Slaughter (1986). Making Sense of Elster. Inquiry 29 (1-4):45 – 56.
Michael Taylor (1986). Elster's Marx. Inquiry 29 (1-4):3 – 10.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads18 ( #67,529 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?