David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1991)
The Parmenides is notorious for the criticisms it directs against Plato's own Theory of Forms, as presented in the middle period. But the second and major portion of the dialogue has generally been avoided, despite its being offered as Plato's response to the problems; the text seems intractably obscure, appearing to consist of a series of bad arguments leading to contradictory conclusions. Carefully analyzing these arguments and the methodological remarks which precede them, Meinwald shows that to understand Plato's response we need to recognize his important distinction between two kinds of predication. Read in the light of this distinction, the arguments can be seen to be sound, and the contradictions merely apparent. Meinwald then proceeds to demonstrate the direct application of Plato's crucial innovation in solving the problems of the first part of the dialogue, including the infamous Third Man. On Meinwald's interpretation, the new distinction is associated with developments in metaphysics which take Plato well beyond the problems commonly thought to tell against Platonism.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.10 used (93% off) $75.46 new (21% off) $90.25 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B378.M45 1991|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
S. Gibbons & C. Legg (2013). Higher-Order One–Many Problems in Plato's Philebus and Recent Australian Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):119 - 138.
D. T. J. Bailey (2009). The Third Man Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):666-681.
Similar books and articles
Egil A. Wylter (1963). Two Recent Interpretations of Plato's Parmenides. Inquiry 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
A. H. Coxon (1999). The Philosophy of Forms: An Analytical and Historical Commentary on Plato's Parmenides: With a New English Translation. Van Gorcum.
J. Tate (1941). Plato and Parmenides Francis Macdonald Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides' Way of Truth and Plato's Parmenides Translated with an Introduction and a Running Commentary. Pp. Xvii+251. London: Kegan Paul, 1939. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):76-78.
Samuel C. Rickless, Plato's Parmenides. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
J. A. Towey (1988). Plato's Parmenides. [REVIEW] American Journal of Philology 109:600-602.
John Anderson Palmer (1999). Plato's Reception of Parmenides. Oxford University Press.
J. D. G. Evans (1992). Predication and the Parmenides Constance C. Meinwald: Plato's Parmenides. Pp. Vii + 192. Oxford University Press, 1991. £27.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):332-334.
Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Edward N. Zalta (2000). How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man. Noûs 34 (2):165–202.
Samuel Charles Rickless (2007). Plato's Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #48,813 of 1,101,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,243 of 1,101,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?