David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 23 (1):1-15 (2007)
The point of departure of any ethical theory is the anthropological fact that normally developed humans must lead their own lives themselves. This means that their conduct is neither programmed nor determined by instincts. Human beings must on every occasion engage the circumstances of a practical situation by their own choice and decision. Even when they find themselves delivered over to the stimuli and powers of particular circumstances in a completely passive manner, this does not occur in the way that it does for a robot, but rather, on the basis of a background of an essential possibility that they can conduct themselves otherwise than they are now behaving. Where there is the possibility of a choice, then the question inevitably arises regarding the principle of the choice. On what do we base our decision to choose one possibility rather than another? We can let fate decide, we can consult astrological charts, we can appeal to an authority, or we can try to find out what we truly want, what are our deepest desires and what choice agrees best with these desires. Finally, we can also inquire into what decision is the objectively correct and rational one, i.e. which decision is good independent of our subjective preferences. This latter case, of course, presupposes a standard of the objectively good and rational, in regard to which we can be responsible for and evaluate our decisions as well as our ensuing actions.
|Keywords||Husserl Ethics Human behaviour|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ullrich Melle (1989). Objektivierende und nicht-objektivierende Akte. In Samuel IJsseling (ed.), Husserl-Ausgabe Und Husserl-Forschung. 35--49.
Citations of this work BETA
Havi Carel & Darian Meacham (2013). Phenomenology and Naturalism: Editors' Introduction. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72:1-21.
Similar books and articles
Charles Conti (1991). Personalist Ontology. The Personalist Forum 7 (2):59-78.
Richard A. Beauchamp (1997). Toward a Personalist Posture. The Personalist Forum 13 (2):252-276.
John Haddox (1992). Latin American Personalist. The Personalist Forum 8 (Supplement):109-118.
Robert Neville (1989). The Boston Personalist Tradition. The Personalist Forum 5 (1):62-64.
Bernard Gendreau (1999). Gabriel Marcel's Personalist Ontological Approach to Technology. The Personalist Forum 15 (2):229-246.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Paul Ricœur (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Warren Steinkraus (1986). The Boston Personalist Tradition in Philosophy, Social Ethics and Theology. The Personalist Forum 2 (2):143-146.
Wei Zhang (2009). The Foundation of Phenomenological Ethics: Intentional Feelings. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):130-142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #43,841 of 1,902,202 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #41,851 of 1,902,202 )
How can I increase my downloads?